An article fromDive Brief Coalition asks judge to halt Trump’s anti-DEI contractor order

The group, led by the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education, filed a lawsuit over the executive order in April.

Published June 10, 2026Emilie Shumway Editor

• Share
  • Copy link
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • X/Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Print
• License
• Add us on Google

President Donald Trump speaks to the press before signing an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House on March 26, 2025, in Washington, D.C. A coalition asked a Maryland judge to block the order on June 4, 2026. Win McNamee via Getty Images

First published on

Dive Brief:

• Plaintiffs involved in a lawsuit against President Donald Trump have requested that a Maryland judge block his executive order targeting diversity, equity and inclusion activities among federal contractors (National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education v. Trump). 
• The coalition, which filed a lawsuit against Trump on April 20, argued the order will cause irreparable harm if the court does not grant a preliminary injunction. “The administration has put federal contractors in an impossible bind: sign away their freedoms of speech and association or forgo doing business — either directly or indirectly — with the government,” it said in a court document filed Thursday.
• Plaintiffs argued they are likely to succeed on the merits that the order violates the First and Fifth Amendments as well as the Administrative Procedure Act.

if (window.dfp_visibility === 'mobile' ) googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.defineSlot( '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid1', [[300, 250], 'fluid'], 'dfp-hybrid1-mobile' ).addService(googletag.pubads()); ); waitToLoadAds.push(function() googletag.cmd.push(function() if (window.dfp_visibility === 'mobile' ) window.onDvtagReady?.(() => googletag.display('dfp-hybrid1-mobile')); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) var adUnitPath = '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid1'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-mobile'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper #dfp-hybrid1-mobile'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') ); ); ); if (window.dfp_visibility === 'desktop' ) googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.defineSlot( '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid2', [[300, 250], 'fluid'], 'dfp-hybrid2-desktop' ).addService(googletag.pubads()); ); waitToLoadAds.push(function() googletag.cmd.push(function() if (window.dfp_visibility === 'desktop' ) window.onDvtagReady?.(() => googletag.display('dfp-hybrid2-desktop')); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) var adUnitPath = '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid2'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-desktop'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper #dfp-hybrid2-desktop'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') ); ); ); Dive Insight:

This case is represented by Democracy Forward and led by the National Association of Diversity Officers of Higher Education — groups not new to taking legal action against the Trump administration for actions meant to suppress DEI.

NADOHE also sued Trump over two January 2025 executive orders which targeted public- and private-sector DEI. While a Maryland judge granted a preliminary injunction in that case in February 2025, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision this past February, determining the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge a provision that directed agency heads to prepare a report that would work to combat “illegal” DEI programs.

Trump’s March 26 executive order directed executive departments and agencies to put a clause in federal contracts and subcontracts requiring these partners to agree they will “not engage in any racially discriminatory DEI activities” or risk the cancellation of their contracts. Agency leaders have until July 24 to ensure compliance with the order.

“At its core, the executive order is a gag rule dressed up as a contract clause,” Sarah von der Lippe, an attorney involved in the case, said in a Democracy Now press release from April. “It demands minority-owned businesses trade their First Amendment right to speak about race and discrimination for fair access to federal contracts.”

Other plaintiffs in the case are the American Association of University Professors; the United Academics of Maryland-University of Maryland, College Park; the National Association of Minority Contractors; and the NAMC, District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia Chapter.

• Add us on Google
• Share
  • Copy link
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • X/Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • License

Filed Under: Federal Policy, Legal /* Keep this hidden until we need to show the v2 challenge. */ .captcha-container display: none; (function () )(); Higher Ed Dive news delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by industry experts

Email:

• Select user consent: By signing up to receive our newsletter, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe at anytime.

Sign up A valid email address is required. Please select at least one newsletter.Editors' picks

• Spencer Platt via Getty ImagesMoody’s lowers Columbia University’s outlook to negative

  In its decision earlier this month, the credit rating agency cited federal pressure on the Ivy League institution and uncertainty around international enrollment.

  By Laura Spitalniak • May 11, 2026
• Retrieved from Senate Appropriations Committee on April 28, 20263 insights from McMahon’s testimony on the Education Department’s budget proposal

  Lawmakers grilled U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon on the agency’s dismantling, its handling of civil rights cases and the future of TRIO. 

  By Natalie Schwartz • April 28, 2026