An article fromDive Brief Judge rules Trump policies deporting foreign students based on speech unconstitutional

“In the United States, freedom of speech belongs to the people,” U.S. District Judge Noël Wise said in her decision. “It is not the government’s to take.”

Published Aug. 31, 2026Laura Spitalniak Editor

• Share
  • Copy link
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • X/Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Print
• License
• Add us on Google

Pedestrians walk on the Stanford University campus on March 28, 2025, in Stanford, Calif. The university's independent student newspaper, The Stanford Daily, sued the Trump administration last year over its policies deporting noncitizen students based on their protected speech. Justin Sullivan / Staff via Getty ImagesListen to the article 4 min This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback. Dive Brief:

• Policies used by the Trump administration to deport legal immigrants because of their speech are unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Friday.
• The Trump administration has revoked hundreds of student visas and sought to deport noncitizen students in the U.S. legally by invoking two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 
• But in her decision last week, U.S. District Judge Noël Wise said the administration's use of INA policies in many cases violated the First Amendment and due process rights. “In the United States, freedom of speech belongs to the people," Wise said. "It is not the government’s to take."

if (window.dfp_visibility === 'mobile' ) googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.defineSlot( '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid1', [[300, 250], 'fluid'], 'dfp-hybrid1-mobile' ).addService(googletag.pubads()); ); waitToLoadAds.push(function() googletag.cmd.push(function() if (window.dfp_visibility === 'mobile' ) window.onDvtagReady?.(() => googletag.display('dfp-hybrid1-mobile')); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) var adUnitPath = '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid1'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-mobile'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper #dfp-hybrid1-mobile'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') ); ); ); if (window.dfp_visibility === 'desktop' ) googletag.cmd.push(function() googletag.defineSlot( '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid2', [[300, 250], 'fluid'], 'dfp-hybrid2-desktop' ).addService(googletag.pubads()); ); waitToLoadAds.push(function() googletag.cmd.push(function() if (window.dfp_visibility === 'desktop' ) window.onDvtagReady?.(() => googletag.display('dfp-hybrid2-desktop')); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) var adUnitPath = '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid2'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-desktop'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper #dfp-hybrid2-desktop'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') ); ); ); Dive Insight:

Last August, Stanford University’s independent student newspaper sued top Trump officials, arguing that the administration was unconstitutionally deporting those it deems to have “anti-American or anti-Israel” views, creating a “pall of fear” that is “incompatible with American liberty.” Free speech and due process rights apply to all people in the U.S., not just American citizens.

Early in President Donald Trump's first year back in office, his administration began targeting noncitizens studying at U.S. colleges, citing the INA. Under the act, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio can revoke student visas and deem a noncitizen eligible for deportation if their statements or associations “compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest.”

Some of the most high-profile cases include students such as Mahmoud Khalil and Rümeysa Öztürk who participated in pro-Palestinian campus protests or published commentary criticizing Israel in the wake of the Israel-Hamas war.

In its complaint, The Stanford Daily said student visa holders at the publication have said no to covering stories related to the conflict out of concern that it would endanger their immigration status. Other international students asked to have their articles taken down or quit the newspaper altogether, while still others on campus largely stopped speaking to student reporters on the record or at all.

Wise sided with the plaintiffs.

“Free speech, including the freedom to criticize the government and its leaders, is not a sign of our democracy’s fragility,” she wrote in her decision. “It is evidence of its strength. That strength is diminished when members of our society — citizens and noncitizens alike — must self-censor and ‘behave’ or suffer the government’s retaliation.”

The judge also noted the government has targeted people over their speech related to Trump's peace deal negotiations with Iran and regarding right-wing commentator and political organizer Charlie Kirk following his murder on Utah Valley University’s campus last year.

"Tomorrow, or perhaps even today, targets may include anyone in the United States who exercises their freedom of speech to simply express opinions the government does not like," she said. "This downward spiral is antithetical to our Constitution that recognizes our right to speak freely."

In addition to infringing on students' free speech rights, the Trump administration's policies are unconstitutionally vague and violate the Fifth Amendment, Wise ruled. The State Department left noncitizens to guess at what conduct could result in their deportation, resulting in self-censorship, she wrote in her decision.

George Porteous, editor-in-chief of the Stanford Daily, praised the decision on Saturday.

"The reporters in our newsroom shouldn't have to fear that writing a story will result in their deportation," Porteous said on social media. "The Court’s decision will enable our reporters to focus on what they do best: asking tough questions and reporting the truth."

He thanked other student newsrooms that supported The Stanford Daily and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which represented the publication.

The U.S. department of State and Homeland Security on Monday did not immediately respond to questions about the decision and if the federal government intends to appeal.

Recommended Reading

• ‘You could be next’: Stanford student newspaper sues over federal attacks on foreign students By Laura Spitalniak • Aug. 7, 2025

• Add us on Google
• Share
  • Copy link
  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • X/Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Print
  • License

Filed Under: Federal Policy, Legal, Students Higher Ed Dive news delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by industry experts

Email:

• Select user consent: By signing up to receive our newsletter, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe at anytime.

Sign up A valid email address is required. Please select at least one newsletter.Editors' picks

• Douglas Rissing via Getty ImagesAnother wave of Education Department regulations is coming

  The Trump administration unveiled its timeline for a host of regulatory changes, including those related to accreditation, diversity initiatives and Title VI. 

  By Natalie Schwartz • July 8, 2026
• Getty ImagesCourt pauses Education Department regulations limiting ‘professional’ degrees

  The agency released widely contested regulations this spring to block access to higher borrowing limits for many graduate students.

  By Ben Unglesbee • June 25, 2026