An article from Dive Brief Michigan representative introduces proposal to explicitly ban antisemitism

If passed, the legislation would formally ban educational institutions from discriminating on the basis of ethnicity, in addition to other protected classes.

Published June 12, 2025 Caroline Colvin Reporter

• post
• share
• post
• print
• email
• license

The Michigan State Capitol building is seen March 17, 2008, in Lansing, Mich. Bill Pugliano via Getty Images

First published on

Listen to the article 2 min This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback. Dive Brief:

• On June 4, state Rep. Noah Arbit introduced an amendment in the Michigan legislature to codify bans on antisemitism in education, employment and housing. 
• The Michigan Antisemitism Protection Act, also known as HB 4548, would be incorporated into the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act. 
• The existing legislation bans educational institutions from discriminating on the basis of race, religion, color and national origin, among other protected classes; this newly introduced amendment would add “ethnicity” to this group of identities.

waitToLoadAds.push(function() { googletag.cmd.push(function() { if (window.dfp_visibility == 'mobile' ) { window.onDvtagReady?.(() => googletag.display('dfp-hybrid1-mobile')); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) { var adUnitPath = '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid1'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) { var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-mobile'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper [data-container-ad-unit-id="' + adUnitPathWithVisibility + '"]'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) { $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') } } }); } }); }); waitToLoadAds.push(function() { googletag.cmd.push(function() { if (window.dfp_visibility == 'desktop' ) { window.onDvtagReady?.(() => googletag.display('dfp-hybrid2-desktop')); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) { var adUnitPath = '/3618/highereddive/highereddivehybrid2'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) { var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-desktop'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper [data-container-ad-unit-id="' + adUnitPathWithVisibility + '"]'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) { $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') } } }); } }); }); Dive Insight:

HB 4548 outlines how protecting ethnicity includes but is not limited to antisemitism, which it defines as “hatred of Jews” and “severe disparagement of Jews or Jewish culture.”

Moreover, this state law amendment bans “mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as a collective,” including myths about “world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government, or other societal institutions.”

The U.S. and the world at large saw an uptick in antisemitism due to conspiracy theorists blaming COVID-19 on Jewish people.

The bill also touches on a common point of contention these days: It bars people from “accusing Jews, whether singularly or collectively, as being more loyal to Israel.” Likewise, the amendment bans people from “demanding a behavior of the State of Israel that is not expected or demanded of other democratic nations” or from blaming Jews for Israel’s actions.

Overall, workplace experts have advocated for Jewish workers in two ways: DEI experts have highlighted the distinct struggles of religious minorities, like Jewish people, in inclusion efforts, and employment lawyers have emphasized the compliance risk of religious discrimination, including antisemitism.

On a federal level, anti-religious bias — and explicitly bias against Jews and Christians — is an increasing enforcement priority of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, while other kinds of discrimination fall by the wayside.

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• purchase licensing rights

Filed Under: Policy & Legal Higher Ed Dive news delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by industry experts

Email:

• Select user consent: By signing up to receive our newsletter, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe at anytime.

Sign up A valid email address is required. Please select at least one newsletter. Editors' picks

• Joe Raedle via Getty Images Gen Z says AI has made their college degrees irrelevant

  New-to-market job seekers are feeling the effects of fervent AI adoption more acutely than any other generation, according to Indeed.

  By Roberto Torres • April 29, 2025
• Ryan Herron/ iStock via Getty Images Duke University offers buyouts and signals future layoffs as federal cuts hit

  Policy changes under the Trump administration could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars in funding losses for the institution.

  By Ben Unglesbee • May 1, 2025