Trump’s anti-DEI orders for colleges and others paused in part

An article from site logo Dive Brief Trump’s anti-DEI orders for colleges and others paused in part

The ruling said that plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their arguments that the directives undermined free speech and were unconstitutionally vague.

Published Feb. 24, 2025 Natalie Schwartz Senior Editor Trump signs an executive order at the Oval Office. President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House on January 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Anna Moneymaker via Getty Images Listen to the article 5 min This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

Dive Brief: 

  • A federal judge on Friday temporarily blocked major portions of President Donald Trump’s recent executive orders that attempt to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the higher education sector and elsewhere. 
  • U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson — a Biden appointee — ruled that the groups that filed the lawsuit were likely to succeed in their arguments that the executive orders undermined free speech and were unconstitutionally vague. 
  • Abelson issued a preliminary injunction barring the Trump administration from ending all “equity-related” federal grants, requiring grant recipients to certify they don’t have any DEI programs, and bringing enforcement actions against wealthy universities to deter their DEI efforts. 

Dive Insight: 

Trump signed a flurry of executive orders in his first few days of office intending to stamp out DEI initiatives nationwide. In response, the American Association of University Professors and the National Association of Diversity Officers in Higher Education helped spearhead a lawsuit against two orders aimed at diversity efforts at colleges and other organizations. 

The first, signed during the first day of Trump’s second term, orders agencies to terminate all “equity-related” grants, though it doesn’t specify what kind of work that encompasses. According to the lawsuit, the order threatens the efforts of faculty members working on grants focused on equity, particularly those at medical schools. 

waitToLoadAds.push(function() { googletag.cmd.push(function() { if (window.dfp_visibility == 'mobile' ) { googletag.display('dfp-hybrid1-mobile'); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) { var adUnitPath = '/21662595662/highereddive/highereddivehybrid1'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) { var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-mobile'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper [data-container-ad-unit-id="' + adUnitPathWithVisibility + '"]'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) { $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') } } }); } }); }); waitToLoadAds.push(function() { googletag.cmd.push(function() { if (window.dfp_visibility == 'desktop' ) { googletag.display('dfp-hybrid2-desktop'); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) { var adUnitPath = '/21662595662/highereddive/highereddivehybrid2'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) { var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-desktop'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper [data-container-ad-unit-id="' + adUnitPathWithVisibility + '"]'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) { $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') } } }); } }); });

Abelson sided with the plaintiffs, which also include the mayor and city council of Baltimore and a membership organization for restaurant workers. The executive order leaves the definition of “equity” unclear, Abelson wrote, risking the possibility of “arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement over billions of dollars in government funding.”

“If a university grant helps fund the salary of a staff person who then helps teach college students about sexual harassment and the language of consent, would the funding for that person’s salary be stripped as ‘equity-related’?” Abelson wrote. 

The plaintiffs also took issue with another anti-DEI order signed Jan. 21. It directs federal agencies to require the recipients of their grants to certify that they don’t have any programs promoting DEI. 

The lawsuit alleges that this provision undermines free speech — an argument Abelson said is likely to succeed. 

“Plaintiffs, their members, and other federal contractors and grantees have shown they are unable to know which of their DEI programs (if any) violate federal anti-discrimination laws, and are highly likely to chill their own speech — to self-censor, and reasonably so — because of the Certification Provision,” Abelson wrote. 

The lawsuit likewise took aim at the executive order’s mandate requiring all government agencies to identify up to nine potential investigations into corporations, associations, foundations or colleges with endowments valued at over $1 billion. 

This provision leaves colleges and other entities with an “untenable choice,” the lawsuit argued, either to keep their DEI programs or to “suppress their own speech” by ending initiatives that the Trump administration may deem unlawful.

In his ruling, Abelson wrote that plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their arguments that this provision represents “unlawful viewpoint-based restriction on protected speech.”

waitToLoadAds.push(function() { googletag.cmd.push(function() { if (window.dfp_visibility == 'mobile' ) { googletag.display('dfp-hybrid2-mobile'); googletag.pubads().addEventListener('slotRenderEnded', function (event) { var adUnitPath = '/21662595662/highereddive/highereddivehybrid2'; var onProformative = false; if (onProformative && event.slot.getAdUnitPath() === adUnitPath && !event.isEmpty ) { var adUnitPathWithVisibility = adUnitPath + '-mobile'; var selector = '.pf-comments__ad-wrapper [data-container-ad-unit-id="' + adUnitPathWithVisibility + '"]'; if (!$(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').hasClass('borders')) { $(selector).closest('.pf-comments__ad-wrapper').addClass('borders') } } }); } }); });

“As the Supreme Court has made clear time and time again, the government cannot rely on the ‘threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion’ to suppress disfavored speech,” Abelson wrote. 

The plaintiffs celebrated the ruling, including NADOHE. 

“This ruling underscores that ensuring equity, diversity, and inclusion are the very goals of federal anti-discrimination law, not a violation of the law,” NADOHE President and CEO Paulette Granberry Russell said in a Friday statement. 

However, conservatives pushed back on the order. 

“DEI is illegal race-based discrimination in violation of the federal Civil Rights Act,” White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said Friday in a post on social media site X. “A judge cannot nullify the Civil Rights Acts and order the government to award federal taxpayer dollars to organizations that discriminate based on race.”

Abelson’s preliminary injunction only blocks the provisions of the two executive orders contested in the lawsuit. It does not pause other elements of the orders.

Filed Under: Policy & Legal Higher Ed Dive news delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by industry experts

Email: Sign up A valid email address is required. Please select at least one newsletter. Daily Dive newsletter example Editors' picks
  • Trump signs an executive order at the Oval Office. Image attribution tooltip Anna Moneymaker via Getty Images Image attribution tooltip How Trump’s Day 1 actions could affect higher education

    New directives took aim at Biden-era efforts to increase educational access for underrepresented students and strengthen LGBTQ+ protections.   

    By Natalie Schwartz • Jan. 22, 2025
  • . Image attribution tooltip Courtesy of Sonoma State University Image attribution tooltip ‘Sobering news’: Sonoma State University makes broad cuts to tackle $24M deficit

    The California public university plans to reduce staff, faculty and majors, as well as fold its athletics program.

    By Ben Unglesbee • Jan. 23, 2025
Email: Sign up A valid email address is required. Please select at least one newsletter. var siteName = 'Higher Ed Dive' || null; if (siteName) { setupFormCallbackAndCreateFormIfSub(siteName, 'inline'); } $(document).ready(function () { // copy the contents of the generic_signup partial into the desktop_signup_spot $desktop_signup_spot = $("#desktop-inline-signup"); $desktop_signup = $("#inline-signup-html-desktop").children(); $desktop_signup_spot.append($desktop_signup); $("#inline-signup-html-desktop").remove(); });

ES by OMG

Euro-Savings.com |Buy More, Pay Less | Anywhere in Europe

Shop Smarter, Stretch your Euro & Stack the Savings | Latest Discounts & Deals, Best Coupon Codes & Promotions in Europe | Your Favourite Stores update directly every Second

Euro-Savings.com or ES lets you buy more and pay less anywhere in Europe. Shop Smarter on ES Today. Sign-up to receive Latest Discounts, Deals, Coupon Codes & Promotions. With Direct Brand Updates every second, ES is Every Shopper’s Dream come true! Stretch your dollar now with ES. Start saving today!

Originally posted on: https://www.highereddive.com/news/judge-blocks-trump-anti-dei-order/740789/